Friday, February 25, 2011

To Provide Some Clarity on the 2 Cardinal Rules

Since there was some confusion about my last post, I figured I may as well clarify things the best I can.

Buffett is not suggesting that it is possible for you to provide 100% assurance against loses. It's all about calculated risks. However, there are some methods that can be used to help reduce the potential for loses (remember the all important principle of margin of safety?).

You've got to read between the lines here. It's really showing you Buffett's view when it comes to investing. Since I know a little more than the average person I'll tell you a few things about him:

- He's not into taking gambles. He likes to invest in companies that are solid and have a proven record of success -- not placing wagers on start-ups.

- He looks for situations where heads he wins, tails he wins too (yes, they exist). If that is not possible, then heads he wins, and tails he doesn't lose much.

- Buffett often remarks that his strategy involves significantly less risk than other methods of investing (and we can all see that it returns significantly more as well).

- Early in his investing career (there are 2 general phases: 1. partnerships, 2. Berkshire Hathaway -- that's a story for another time) he told his shareholders that he planned to achieve a long-term above average return that will likely be made up of 1. returns that approximately equal the average during prosperous periods, and 2. returns that are better than average during down markets (don't lose money!). This would work out to above average returns.

I could list more, but I just got home from an exam and I am tired. And you're probably all tired of this topic already! Have a good night everyone.

15 comments:

  1. Not sure I should get into investing, it still seems so risky!

    ReplyDelete
  2. So basically, you have to study a company and it's market and competition and then make an educated guess, right?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reminds of a mafia movie saying, "I only bet on a sure thing."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for clearing things up, couldn't make much out of that last post. Rest well^^

    ReplyDelete
  5. It created confusion? I kindof figured as much, I mean you can't really take it LITERALLY but within reason it all seemed fair to me..

    ReplyDelete
  6. im an Economics major
    and a stock market nerd
    i love your blog

    ReplyDelete
  7. so my example of a loss buffered by the gain is within the buffet!

    ReplyDelete
  8. That's interesting. Thanks for the info.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is very interesting, thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Warren Buffett is a fantastic investor. I love how he's always lived in Nebraska, regardless of how much money he's got. Though I think he owns homes elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm not really tired of it, man, and I hope you did well on your exam! With knowledge like this as a student, I can't wait to see you as a journeyman and then a master...

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'll still take it as good advice. =)

    ReplyDelete